<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pit bulls, Lipstick, Pigs&#8230;Oh My!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.acoffeetogo.com/2008/09/10/pit-bulls-lipstick-pigsoh-my.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.acoffeetogo.com/2008/09/10/pit-bulls-lipstick-pigsoh-my.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 15:28:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: REB 84</title>
		<link>http://www.acoffeetogo.com/2008/09/10/pit-bulls-lipstick-pigsoh-my.html/comment-page-1#comment-81</link>
		<dc:creator>REB 84</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 01:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://acoffeetogo.com/2008/09/10/pit-bulls-lipstick-pigsoh-my.html #comment-81</guid>
		<description>The right-wing talking heads are up to their old tricks of distortion and distraction by playing the self-righteous victim over Barack Obama&#039;s &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/chi-campaign-lipstick-sep11,0,4011895.story&quot; REL=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&#039;lipstick on a pig&#039;&lt;/a&gt; reference to the McCain campaign&#039;s claim to be change agents.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;As usual, the news media is all over this little manufactured spat.  However, I have not heard anyone mention another way of looking at this thing.  Could it be argued that  the G.O.Pig represents a continuation of the past eight years of &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://www.paidforbybigoil.com/&quot; REL=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;bankrupt policies&lt;/a&gt;, and Sarah Palin is the young attractive lipstick that has been applied to this pig to make it more appealing?&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;a HREF=&quot;http://questionitnow.com/&quot; REL=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;QuestionItNow&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The right-wing talking heads are up to their old tricks of distortion and distraction by playing the self-righteous victim over Barack Obama&#8217;s <a HREF="http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/chi-campaign-lipstick-sep11,0,4011895.story" REL="nofollow">&#8216;lipstick on a pig&#8217;</a> reference to the McCain campaign&#8217;s claim to be change agents.</p>
<p>As usual, the news media is all over this little manufactured spat.  However, I have not heard anyone mention another way of looking at this thing.  Could it be argued that  the G.O.Pig represents a continuation of the past eight years of <a HREF="http://www.paidforbybigoil.com/" REL="nofollow">bankrupt policies</a>, and Sarah Palin is the young attractive lipstick that has been applied to this pig to make it more appealing?</p>
<p><a HREF="http://questionitnow.com/" REL="nofollow">QuestionItNow</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
